![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6aa909_ec136acd130f452fbd9b693c01a925f0~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_980,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/6aa909_ec136acd130f452fbd9b693c01a925f0~mv2.jpg)
I started my venture into enablement through the Sales Training entry point, and as such, I have been through multiple TTT (train-the-trainer) programs. They typically follow a similar structure.
I've created my own internal processes for succession and sustainability plans in having back up trainers and ensuring quality of subject matter expert facilitators.
I've recently onboarded a few new people to take over existing programs so this format has been helpful to provide structure through their ramping process. Here's the 4-step process I follow:
Participation: Have the new facilitator join the session as a participant. They should take notes on points of facilitation vs instruction, identify opportunities for engagement and call out points of confusion. Upon completion of this initial participation, begin drafting a facilitator guide with speaking notes and reminders for activities. Feel free to add a dry-run with the original facilitator or leader to work through any points of contention.
Co-facilitation: Have the new facilitator co-present with the original facilitator. Assign the new facilitator a mix of sections that are quick wins to build confidence and some of the tougher portions to navigate in a safe space with support in the room.
Observed facilitation: While the new facilitator is leading the session, the original should be taking copious notes for feedback. Leverage a standard training feedback form to ensure a structured and productive conversation. Only chime in for support when engaged.
Full ownership: After the facilitator has received sufficient marks on their feedback form. Give ample freedom to run the program independently and be a sounding board to reflect on challenges or ideas for altering content to continuously enhance the learning experience.
Comments